Petitioner sought quashing of FIR based on a settlement. Court held that as parties settled and victim does not wish to pursue complaint, criminal proceedings are futile and order their quashing.
FIR No.688/2015 and consequent proceedings under Sections 451/354/506 IPC quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
SHALENDER SHUKLA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Sudhakar Kumar, Advocate.
versus
NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms Anita Abraham, Addl. PP for the State. SI Praveen Kumar, PS Mandawali.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 12.02.2018 Crl. M.A. 2621-22/2018(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 726/2018
Crl.M.C.726/2018
Page 1
Courts, Delhi, on 25.09.2017 and further that she does not wish to press her complaint any further.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 ‘Sn’
Crl.M.C.726/2018
Page 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether FIR u/s 451/354/506 IPC can be quashed upon settlement of disputes.
Whether continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility.
SHALENDER SHUKLA
NCT OF DELHI
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
