The court permitted the quashing of an FIR and consequential proceedings regarding property disputes due to a voluntary settlement between the parties where terms were complied with.
FIR no. 314/2016 and consequent proceedings quashed; miscellaneous application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SEEMA GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.
versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. G. M. Farooqui, APP for State. SI Sumit Thakran, P.S. Bhalswa Dairy
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R
% 23.01.2018
It is submitted that the property disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 had led to registration of FIR No 314/2016 under Sections 406/467/471/420 IPC at Police Station Bhalaswa Dairy on the complaint of respondent No.2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 have settled their disputes amicably before the Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi on 15.11.2017. Therefore, aforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings be quashed. Respondent No. 2 is present in court and has been identified by SI Sumit Thakran of Police Station Bhalaswa Dairy. Respondent No. 2 says that he has settled the matter with the petitioner of his own free will and without any undue force, pressure and coercion and inasmuch as all the terms of the settlement have been complied with. Petitioner says that she has received a sum of `12,50,000/- in terms of the settlement.
Respondent no. 2 says he has received the possession of the property with all the documents. He has no objection in case aforesaid FIR is quashed.
Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, FIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti .
A.K. PATHAK, J
JANUARY 23, 2018 SRwt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the FIR registered for property disputes and consequential proceedings in light of a voluntary settlement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Seema Gupta
State (Govt of NCT Delhi)
Respondent No. 2
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
