Kuldeep Singh Yadav & Ors. Vs State (Govt of Nct) & Anr.

Respondent No. 2 Ms. Poonam Yadav is present in Court along with her counsel. Respondent No. 2 says that he has settled the matter with the petitioner No.1 of her own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion vide memorandum of understanding-cum-settlement dated 09.10.2017. First motion has already been accepted. Respondent No. 2 says that she has already received a sum of 10 lacs from the petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.1 says that the remaining balance sum of 10 lacs will be paid at the time of second motion. Respondent No. 2 says that she has no objection in case FIR against the petitioner No.1 and his relatives, i.e., petitioner Nos. 2-5, is quashed subject to the petitioner No.1 cooperating at the time of second motion and paying the balance settled amount of ` 10 lacs to her.

¶12

In view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner No.1

¶13

and the respondent No.2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 197/2017 under Sections498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Samai Pur Badli is quashed, subject to the petitioner No.1 paying the balance settled amount of ` 10 lacs at the time of second motion.

¶14

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti .

¶15

A.K. PATHAK, J

¶16

JANUARY 22, 2018 SRwt

Kuldeep Singh Yadav & Ors. v. State (Govt of Nct) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Singh Yadav & Ors. v. State (Govt of Nct) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R Ravi & Anr. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Magnum Interiors Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Seema Chandra

Ajay Yadav & Anr. Vs the State & Anr.

Kiran Devi Vs Govt of NCT Delhi

Deepak & Ors. Vs Govt.of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mehmood Vs State Govt.of NCT of Delhi & Anr.