The Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and released a fixed deposit of Rs.50 lakh to the respondent, noting that parties had divorced via mutual consent and settled disputes with full payment.
FIR No.33/2017 and consequent proceedings quashed; fixed deposit of Rs.50,00,000/- released to Respondent No.2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
AAKASH PUNATAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Pawan Upadhyay with Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay and Mr. Rajes Chhetri, Advocates.
versus
N.C.T OF DLEHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 02.02.2018
Crl.M.A.2000/2018 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 542/2018
CRL.M.C. 542/2018
Page 1
16. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2018/st
CRL.M.C. 542/2018
Page 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an FIR and subsequent proceedings emanating from matrimonial discord under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC should be quashed upon settlement and divorce by mutual consent.
Whether the fixed deposit of Rs.50,00,000/- should be released to the respondent.
Aakash Punatar
N.C.T of Delhi
Respondent No.2
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
