Quashed
Sonu v. State(Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./518/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Pa g e 1 $~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
Through : Mr Shretas Mehrotra, Advocate.
versus
STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms Anita Abraham, Addl. PP for the State. Mr Ajay Kumar, Advocate for R-3. SI Praveen Kumar, PS Mandawali.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 01.02.2018 Crl. M.A. 1901/2018(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 518/2018 & Crl. M.A. 1900/2018(stay)
Crl.M.C.518/2018
Page 1
Crl.M.C.518/2018
Page 2
and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 01, 2018 ‘Sn’
Crl.M.C.518/2018
Page 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 354 IPC and Section 8 POCSO should be quashed given the victim was over 18 at the time of commission.
Whether quashing is appropriate where parties have settled disputes and the victim does not wish to press charges.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sonu
State (NCT of Delhi) & ORS.
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court