The Court quashed FIR No.254/2010 and consequent proceedings under Section 482 CrPC in a landlord-tenant dispute where parties reached a settlement and the complainant had no objection to quashing.
FIR No.254/2010 under Sections 323/342/354/34 IPC and all consequent proceedings are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
AMBOJ KUMAR & ANR
..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Sameer Chandra, Advocate with petitioners.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
..... Respondents Through : Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP with SI Rich Pal Singh, PS Sunlight Colony, Delhi. Ms.Ritika Seth, Advocate for respondent No.2/complainant in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 25.10.2018
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr P C filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.254/2010 under Section 323/342/354/34 IPC registered at police station Sunlight Colony, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2.
This petition has been filed on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties on 22.05.2017 before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi, which is annexed with the petition.
Admittedly, the dispute is between the landlord and tenant and two cross cases were registered on the respective complaints of parties.
CRL.M.C. 5411/2018
Page 1of 2
The petitioners have since withdrew their cases against the respondents No.2 & 3 pursuant to the aforesaid settlement, hence this petition.
The respondent No.2/complainant and respondent No.3 have been duly identified by the Investigating Officer concerned and says they have no objection if the FIR is quashed against the petitioners.
The learned APP informs charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners before learned Trial Court and has no objection if the FIR is quashed as it was primarily a dispute between the landlord and tenant which culminated into this FIR.
In view of above statements made by the parties, FIR No.254/2010 under Section 323/342/354/34 IPC registered at police station Sunlight Colony against the petitioners and all the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
The petition is disposed of in above terms. Order dasti .
YOGESH KHANNA, J
OCTOBER 25, 2018 M
CRL.M.C. 5411/2018 Page 2of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and consequent proceedings under Sections 323/342/354/34 IPC in a landlord-tenant dispute should be quashed following a mediated settlement.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
AMBOJ KUMAR & ANR
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
COMPLAINANT
YOGESH KHANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
