Quashed

Sh. Arvind Kumar Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC25 Oct 2018CRL.M.C./5125/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act following a settlement agreement where the complainant withdrew matrimonial cases and obtained a mutual consent divorce. The court directed the petitioners to deposit Rs. 10,000.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 579/2015 and consequential proceedings quashed; Petitioners directed to deposit Rs. 10,000 in CMDRF within four weeks.

Sh. Arvind Kumar Singh & Ors. Vs State & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~23

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5125/2018

¶3

SH. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person.

¶4

versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State with SI Omender Kumar, PS Welcome, Delhi. Mr.Manmohan Swaroop and Ms.Sanyogita Swaroop, Advocates with respondent No.2/complainant in person.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

% 25.10.2018

¶8

This is a petition under Section 482 Cr P C filed by the petitioners for quashing of the FIR No.579/2015 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act registered at police station Welcome, Delhi registered against them on the complaint of respondent No.2.

¶9

The respondent No.2 was married to petitioner No.1. There is no issue from this wedlock and since 13.10.2014 they are living separately. Dispute arose in their matrimonial life and CC No.8059/2016 under Domestic Violence Act was filed by respondent No.2 against petitioner No.1. She also filed petition under Section CRL.M.C. 5125/2018 Page 1 of 3

¶10

13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act. During the pendency, the parties settled their disputes vide settlement agreement dated 26.05.2018 before the Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi for a total sum of Rs.24.00 Lacs for her all claims in full and final settlement. Pursuant thereto, the respondent No.2 withdrew both the cases before the learned Trial Court and have obtained divorce by mutual consent vide judgment and decree dated 27.08.2018.

¶11

The agreed / settlement amount of Rs.24.00 Lacs has been received by the respondent No.2 from petitioners, including an amount of Rs.11.00 Lac vide demand draft No.760601 dated 04.10.2018 drawn on Syndicate Bank.

¶12

The respondent No.2/complainant duly identified by the Investigating Officer concerned, on receipt of entire settled amount says she has no objection, if the aforesaid FIR is quashed against the petitioners. The learned APP informs that pursuant to investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners before learned Trial Court and says if the Court is inclined to quash the FIR, petitioners be put to some terms as government machinery has been put into motion.

¶13

In view of above statements made by the parties, FIR No.579/2015 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act registered at police station Welcome, Delhi against petitioners and all the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. The petitioners are directed to deposit a cost of Rs.10,000/- within a period of four weeks from today with Kerala

¶14

CRL.M.C. 5125/2018 Page 2 of 3

¶15

Chief Minister’s Distress Relief Fund (CMDRF) and furnish a copy thereof to the learned Trial Court.

¶16

The petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending application is also disposed of as infructuous. Order dasti .

¶17

YOGESH KHANNA, J

¶18

OCTOBER 25, 2018 M

¶19

Page 3 of 3

¶20

CRL.M.C. 5125/2018

Sh. Arvind Kumar Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh. Arvind Kumar Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Priyadarshi Vs Manju

Shalu Vs NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Gaurav Bansal & Ors. Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Virendra Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Ranjeet Mandal Vs State of Delhi ( NCT of Delhi)

Amboj Kumar & Anr. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.