The High Court of Delhi dismissed a petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent during settlement talks scheduled on 21.04.2017.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA O R D E R
As per the proceedings dated 21.04.2017, it is indicated that the settlement talks were in progress.
None being present on behalf of petitioner, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
JANUARY 22, 2018/MK
M/s Jai Mata International Pvt Ltd
State & Ors
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
