The petitioner withdrew the petition for quashing of an FIR, seeking liberty to file it afresh upon settlement with the injured party. The court dismissed the petition with the liberty granted.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file the petition afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Moolchand, PS Okhla.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
CRL.M.A. 18883/2017
This is an application seeking exemption from filing certified copy of order, which is allowed subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.A. 18884/2017
This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 3 days in refilling the Crl. Misc. Application for removal of objections, which is allowed.
CRL.M.C. 4740/2017
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR no. 268/2017, PS Okhla Industrial, South East under Sections 279/337 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Inter alia, apart from the respondent nos. 1 & 2 arrayed on record, i.e., Commissioner of Police, ITO, New Delhi & Station House Officer, Police Station Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi, respondent no. 3 arrayed
on record is Ms. Jasmeet Arora, the stated injured in relation to FIR in question.
At this stage, inter alia, submissions have been made on behalf of the petitioner that the matter between the respondent no. 3 and the Insurance Company has already been settled as per the proceedings in MACT no. 697/2017 on 17.09.2017 and learned counsel for the petitioner, now, seeks to withdraw the present petition seeking liberty to file it afresh in view of the submission that the respondent no.3 and the insurance company have already arrived at a settlement and seeks liberty to file the petition afresh in the event of any settlement between the petitioner and the respondent no.3 which submission is not opposed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 & 2.
The present petition is thus dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted as prayed.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
JANUARY 22, 2018 Neha Chopra/vm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking quashing of FIR should be dismissed because the petitioner withdrew it with liberty to file afresh upon settlement.
Sangeeta Khurana
Commissioner of Police
Ms. Jasmeet Arora
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
