Petition for cancellation of interim bail was dismissed as the interim period was expiring for one accused and the other had already been granted regular bail, rendering the petition infructuous.
Petition for cancellation of interim bail was not entertained and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 04.01.2018
By this petition, petitioner has prayed for cancellation of interim bail
granted to the respondent nos. 3 and 4 by the trial court. This petition has virtually become infructuous since interim bail period of respondent no. 3, is expiring on 5th January, 2018. As regards respondent no.4 is concerned, he has already been granted regular bail by a subsequent order. Accordingly, present petition for cancellation of interim bails of respondent nos.3 and 4 is not entertained. Petition is dismissed.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 04, 2018 ga
Kirti Kumari
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
