Single judge of the Delhi High Court dismissed a bail application withdrawn by the petitioner. The court ordered the Trial Court to conclude prosecution witness examination within three months.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Trial Court directed to conclude examination of prosecution witnesses within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
KUMAR SONAM @ VIPIN ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Abhimanyu K. With Mr. Ankur Modi, Advocates.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. Insp. Tulsi Ram, PS Najafgarh.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 04.01.2018
BAIL APPLN. 1785/2017
Page 1
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 04, 2018 st
BAIL APPLN. 1785/2017
Page 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail application should be allowed or dismissed considering the delay in trial and availability of witnesses.
Whether the Trial Court should be directed to conclude the examination of prosecution witnesses within a specified time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kumar Sonam @ Vipin
State
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
