Tanjeer Alam @ Raja v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi granted the petitioner sanction plenitude for parole for four weeks subject to furnishing a bond, providing contact details, and reporting to the local SHO weekly.
What did the court decide?
Parole granted for four weeks from date of release subject to furnishing bond, surety, mobile number, address, and reporting to local SHO every Monday.
What the court decided
$~13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 3467/2017 TANJEER ALAM @ RAJA
..... Petitioner Through None. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with SI Naveen Kumar from P.S.Seelam Pur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 15.02.2018
Learned counsel for the State (under instructions from the Investigating Officer) submits that the Bihar address of the petitioner since stands verified. The earlier order had noted that the petitioner was seeking parole for the first time. He had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years. He had suffered incarceration of about 3 years. His jail conduct is satisfactory. The address of the petitioner has been has been verified.
Petitioner be granted parole for a period of four weeks (to be counted from the date of his release) on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendant concerned with condition that the petitioner shall surrender himself to the jail immediately on the
expiry of the aforenoted parole period; he shall also furnish his latest mobile number and residential address to the local SHO; he shall also report to the local SHO on every Monday of each week.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tanjeer Alam @ Raja
- respondent
State
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court