Arif v. State (Govt.of NCT of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court despite prior notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
Represented by: None
versus
STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with ASI Dinesh Tyagi, PS Mayur Vihar
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 19.07.2018
Despite pass over, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 19, 2018 ‘rk’
Arif
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court