Petition dismissed as withdrawn. The Additional Standing Counsel for the State stated the petitioners are residents of Gaya and one statement had been recorded before the learned Magistrate. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition and application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
versus
STATE & OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Palam Village
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 07.12.2018
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioners are resident of Gaya and are now residing at Gaya. Statement of petitioner No.2 has already been recorded before the learned Magistrate at Gaya.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
DECEMBER 07, 2018 mamta
Akash Kumar & Anr.
State & Others
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
