Chandani v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1.
CHANDANI
..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate with Insp. Ravindra Rajput & SI Kishore Kr, AHTU
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R % 11.09.2018
Further status report has been filed on record. The same has been perused. The petitioner’s daughter came back to home on 04.09.2018. She was medically got examined at AIIMS, New Delhi. The doctor opined that she is carrying a pregnancy of 36 weeks. Mr. Mehra submits that she is presently hospitalised and is likely to deliver a child any time.
Her statement was got recorded before the learned Magistrate under Section 164 Cr PC on 05.09.2018. She stated that on 12.08.2017, she had married the suspect Shahrukh without any pressure and she was staying with him at his house, and the child she carries in her womb is that of Shahrukh.
Mr. Mehra further submits that the petitioner was not willing to take back her daughter unless her daughter aborted the foetus. However, the petitioner, who is present in court, states that she is willing to take back her daughter along with the child.
It shall be open to the petitioner to approach the CWC, which shall take a call on the said aspect after hearing the parties.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2018
sr
Chandani
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Vipin Sanghi
I.S. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court