Satpal Singh v. Smt Mithlesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw criminal appeal. Both parties agreed payment of the ordered fine had been made. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise submissions in trial court.
What the court decided
$~21
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 1821/2015
SATPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhik Kumar, Advoate
versus
SMT MITHLESH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rohit Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
- O R D E R
- % 23.01.2018
At the outset it has been submitted on behalf of the respondent that the petition has virtually become infructuous as in view of the impugned order dated 18.3.2015 of the learned Principal Judge, Shahdara, Delhi in CC No. 798/2014 a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- out of the total ordered sum of Rs.2,00,000/- has been paid to the respondent. The said submission is not refuted on behalf of the petitioner submitting to the effect that the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- has already been paid by the petitioner to the respondent out of the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and that the balance sum in terms of the said order dated 18.3.2015 amounting to Rs.50,000/- will also be paid.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satpal Singh
- respondent
Smt Mithlesh
Coram
Anu Malhotra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court