Dismissed
Alka v. the State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.L.P./60/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
ALKA ..... Petitioner
THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Govind Singh, PS Uttam Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
CRL.L.P. 60/2017 and Crl.M.A. No. 1774/2017
No notice in the petition and application has been issued as yet. On 9th February, 2017 the matter came up when trial Court record was requisitioned for perusal.
On 5th May, 2017 the petition was renotify on 1st August, 2017 when learned proxy counsel for the petitioner stated that counsel for the petitioner has been recently engaged in the matter and thus sought an adjournment. On 10th January, 2018 again a new counsel entered appearance and stated that the counsel has been recently engaged and sought time to file the Vakalatnama. Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner has not been filed.
This Court on 10th January, 2018 specifically noted that it appears that
CRL.L.P. 60/2017 page 1 of 2
repeated change of counsels has been made by the petitioner and the matter was adjourned on the request of the counsel, who was recently engaged, to file the vakalatnama on record. Till date no vakalatanama on behalf of the petitioner has been placed. No counsel for the petitioner is present.
Petition and application are dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 12, 2018 ‘yo’
page 2 of 2
CRL.L.P. 60/2017
ALKA
THE STATE
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court