Suyash Dhanuka v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C.…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 1282/2016 & Crl.M.A. 5506/2016
SUYASH DHANUKA ..... Petitioner
- Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Adv.
- versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. Mr. Akshay Bhatia & Mr. Avinash Das, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R % 12.11.2018
The second respondent present through Mr. Akshay Bhatia, Advocate wants to make a statement which is recorded separately.
The second respondent (complainant) having given its no objection and consent to the prayer in the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the summoning order dated 17.02.2016 against the petitioner Suyash Dhanuka in criminal complaint case no. 56330/2016 titled M/s G.H. Textiles and Sarees vs. M/s Shyam Retails (India) Pvt. Ltd. is hereby quashed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the summoning order in Criminal Complaint No. 56330/2016 should be quashed upon the second respondent's non-objection.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suyash Dhanuka
- respondent
State
Coram
R.K. Gauba
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court