Single judge order where the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition following a Supreme Court ruling, resulting in the petition being dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. D.S. Patial, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with W/ASI Sushma, PS Uttam Nagar. Respondent no. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
After some hearing, upon his attention being drawn to the ruling of the Supreme Court reported as Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another, (2017) 9 SCC 641, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2018 nk
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others v. State of Gujarat and AnotherReferred¶11
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another, (2017) 9 SCC 641 · Who else cites this
SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
