Petitioner sought preservation of a Revocation Deed in compliance with a prior order. The court directed the first respondent to preserve the document and disposed of the petition.
The petitioner was granted direction to preserve the Revocation Deed with the first respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
AMITA GANDOAK ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Sujit Kumar and Mr. Ahmad Chichara, Advocates
versus
RAJ PAL MEENA SUB REGISTRAR III, ASAF ALI ROAD AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghai and Ms. Urvashi Tripthi, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that document i.e. Revocation Deed has now been traced out and it be preserved in terms of order of 16th October, 2017.
No further orders are called for in this petition except that the document i.e. Revocation Deed be preserved by first respondent.
This petition is disposed of accordingly.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
DECEMBER 10, 2018/ p’ma
Page | 1
Amita Gandoak
Raj Pal Meena Sub Registrar III, Asaf Ali Road and Anr
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
