Dismissed

Jyoti Bisht v. Parveen Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Delhi HC7 Dec 2018CONT.CAS(C)/450/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the violation of an order regarding work stop notice. The Court examined compliance reports and found that demolition actions were taken making the premises unusable. The petition was accordingly disposed of with liberty to revive if inaccuracies exist in the compliance report.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to revive if inaccuracy exists in the Compliance Report of 7th December 2018.

Jyoti Bisht Vs Parveen Kumar Gupta & Ors. — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~10

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CONT.CAS(C) 450/2017 & C.M. 22524/2017 JYOTI BISHT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Javed Ahmad, Advocate

¶4

Versus

¶5

PARVEEN KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing counsel for respondent No.1- NDMC with Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, Advocate & SI Pritam Singh Mr. Anjum Javed, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Yashpal Singh, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶7

O R D E R % 07.12.2018

¶8

Violation of order of 26^th April, 2013 is alleged in this petition. Vide aforesaid order, local police was directed to enforce the Work Stop Notice and it was clarified that the construction in the subject property would be carried out in accordance with the sanctioned plan.

¶9

In the Status Report filed by respondent-NDMC, it is stated that unauthorized / illegal construction has been demolished in Plot No. 167162, Kucha Dalkhni Rai, Darya Ganj, New Delhi. In the Status Report filed, it has been specifically stated that on 8^th August, 2018, unauthorized

¶10

Page | 2

¶11

construction at the roof of first floor and three panels of the roof slab have been demolished by using gas cutters. Along with the Status Report, photographs have been filed and it perusal reveals that demolition action has taken place on the roof of the subject premises.

¶12

Petitioner’s counsel submits that unauthorized construction has not been completely demolished and there is still violation of easement rights of petitioner.

¶13

During the course of hearing, respondent’s counsel has handed over Compliance Report of 7^th December, 2018 and its perusal reveals that demolition action has been taken on 17^th August, 2017 and 8^th August, 2018 and that Special Demolition Action was also undertaken on 6^th December, 2018 and the subject premises has been made unusable. Some photographs have been also appended with it. Copy of Compliance Report of 7^th December, 2018 has been handed over to petitioner’s counsel.

¶14

In view of above, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition in the light of Compliance Report of 7^th December, 2018, with liberty to petitioner to get this petition revived if there is any inaccuracy in the Compliance Report of 7^th December, 2018.

¶15

This petition and application are accordingly disposed of.

¶16

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE

¶17

DECEMBER 07, 2018 r

¶18

Page | 3

Jyoti Bisht v. Parveen Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Bisht v. Parveen Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asmat Ara & Ors. Vs Majid Dev Bhandi

D R Mittal Vs Kamaljeet Kaur

Jasbir Dabas Vs M/S Pheonix Arc Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Phoenix Arc Private Limited Vs Raj Dulari & Ors.

Amita Gandoak Vs Raj Pal Meena Sub Registrar Iii, Asaf Ali Road and Anr.

Syed Hamidullah Vs a Mona Shreenivas

Capt Anand Sarup Bhardwaj & Ors. Vs Rohit Nandan, Chairman and Managing Director of Air India

Ex Insp/Gd Gaffar Khan (Retd) Vs Rajiv Gauba & Ors.

Delhi Transport Corporation through Its Chairman Vs Anil Kumar

South Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Lekh Raj and Anr.

South Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Ganga Saran & Ors.

Ram Karan Rai & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Kajal Kanti Nath Vs S K Pattanayak, Secretary & Ors.

Ramesh Chandra Mondal Vs S K Pattanayak, Secretary & Ors.