Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition as respondents had complied with Court directions. Leave was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MADHU & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through Ms. Sija Nair Pal and Ms. Pragya Singh, Advocates with Petitioner No.2 in person
versus VISHWESH CHAUBE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 23.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition, in view of the circumstance that the respondents have since complied with the directions issued by this Court.
Leave granted.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 23, 2018/ as
MADHU & ANR
VISHWESH CHAUBE & ORS
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
