Dismissed
Ramesh Vaishno Dhaba v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3291/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAMESH VAISHNO DHABA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Diwanshu Sehgal and Mr. Vikrant Choudhary, Advocates
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR
..... Respondents
Through Mr. Harish Kr. Khinchi, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shashi Bala, Advocate for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 23.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 23, 2018 as
RAMESH VAISHNO DHABA
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court