The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as the appellant sought to withdraw it, intending to produce evidence before the civil court instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~03
KAMALJEET YADAV & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Azam Ansari, Advocate.
versus SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL, CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 02.01.2018
After some hearing, counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal and states that that would take steps to produce evidence in support of his claim before the civil court.
In view of the statement made, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JANUARY 02, 2018 NA
KAMALJEET YADAV & ANR
SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
