Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file a reply against a show cause notice. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and clarified no merits were commented upon.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a reply within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~02
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GLOBAL COAL & MINING PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ragvendra Singh, Advocate.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 02.01.2018
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a reply to the show cause notice in which it will be inter alia, pleaded that the final order should be kept in abeyance till decision of the Tribunal in the appeal to be preferred by the petitioner-assessee against an earlier order.
would apply its mind independently and decide the issues and contentions raised.
Dasti under signature of the Court Master.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
JANUARY 02, 2018 NA
GLOBAL COAL & MINING PVT LTD
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
