The High Court of Delhi disposed of the company petition as withdrawn upon the filing of a Settlement Agreement signed by both the petitioner and the respondent, treating the agreement as binding on the parties.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the Settlement Agreement filed before this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27 (company matter)
JINDAL INFRA BUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kapil Rustagi with Mr.Rohan Jaitley, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 02.11.2018 CO.APPL.1307/2018 & Co.Pet.649/2015
This application, jointly filed by the petitioner and respondent, carrying the signatures of the parties as well as their respective learned counsel, seeks grant of permission to the petitioner to withdraw the company petition as the petitioner and the respondent have arrived at a settlement. The Settlement Agreement has been filed with the application and is marked as Annexure-A. Mr.Saakaar Sardana and Mr.Kapil Rustagi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondent respectively, are ad idem that the matter has been settled.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the Settlement Agreement filed before this Court which shall be treated as a part of the order and to which both the parties undertake to remain bound.
A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Court Master.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
NOVEMBER 02, 2018/ sa
Utsav Bhasin
Jindal Infra Build Private Limited
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
