Legal proceedings were instituted through a writ petition but were ultimately dismissed following the petitioners' request to withdraw the application during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~190
M/S ARORA MATHEY LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr.S.M.Pandey with Mr.V.K.Ahuja, Advocates.
versus
SH. MOHAN KUMAR ..... Respondent
Through : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 02.11.2018
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
NOVEMBER 02, 2018/ sa
M/S ARORA MATHEY LTD. AND ORS
SH. MOHAN KUMAR
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
