Dismissed
Umesh Singh v. O P Verma
Delhi HCCM(M)/1483/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.H.Rehman and Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocates.
versus
O P VERMA
..... Respondent
Through : None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R % 05.12.2018 CM APPL No.50906/2018
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 1483/2018& CM APPL No.50905/2018
This petition challenges the impugned order dated 13.09.2018 whereby the learned Trial Court rejected the application of the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC holding the suit is primarily for damages which the plaintiff / respondent has suffered while contesting the complaint case filed by the petitioner before the District Consumer Redressal Forum, Kashmere Gate, Delhi. It is further observed the said damages are qua the payments made to the counsels, mental harassment as also qua the losses suffered in the business due to court hearings.
The learned Trial Court while passing the impugned order has considered the material facts/documents available on record and there is no infirmity in the impugned order, accordingly, the petition is dismissed. The pending application also stands dismissed.
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
DECEMBER 05, 2018 M
UMESH SINGH
O P VERMA
YOGESH KHANNA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court