Petition disposed of as petitioner no longer wished to pursue it after landlady sold the premises to him, rendering eviction order infructuous.
Petition and pending application disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
OM PRAKASH BHATIA & ANR
..... Petitioners
Through : Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocate. versus
NATHU DEVI
..... Respondent
Through : Mr.Sindhu Sakkarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 05.12.2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner submit since the landlady / respondent has sold the premises in question to the petitioner, hence the eviction order has become infructuous and the petitioner does not wish to pursue this petition. The learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the above position.
In view of above, the petition and pending application is disposed of. No order as to cost.
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
DECEMBER 05, 2018
M
OM PRAKASH BHATIA
NATHU DEVI
YOGESH KHANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
