The present petition was allowed to be withdrawn as the petitioner had passed away. The legal heirs are directed to move an appropriate application before the trial Court.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn as petitioner passed away.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
Through: Ms. Sindhu Sakkarwal & Mr. Hitender Sakkarwal, Advocates
versus
VIJAY KUMAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma & Mr. Ramanpreet Singh, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 10.01.2018
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed away on 5th January, 2018 and in this view of the matter, the present petition may be allowed to be withdrawn as the legal heirs of the petitioner will have to move appropriate application before the trial Court.
The petition is dismissed accordingly.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JANUARY 10, 2018 nk
PRABHA DEVI
VIJAY KUMAR & ANR
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
