Ritu Taneja v. Vineet Taneja
Case brief
What is this about?
Clarifying that the Family Court has discretion to decide on issuing video copies based on interest of justice after examining evidence.
What did the court decide?
Clarification granted to Family Court regarding discretion on video copies.
What the court decided
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 1156/2017
R ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate versus V ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vineet Taneja, respondent in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 09.08.2018
CM APPL. 30052/2018
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CM APPL. 30051/2018
- The petitioner is seeking clarification of the order dated 23rd May, 2018.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 23rd May, 2018, this Court directed Deputy Registrar to send two pen drives to the learned Family Court in the sealed cover and the Family Court was given liberty to examine the same and pass appropriate orders as may be necessary in the interest of justice.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court's previous order permitted the Family Court to furnish video copies to the petitioner.
Whether the Family Court has discretion to examine video evidence and decide on furnishing copies based on interest of justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R
- respondent
V
Coram
J.R. Midha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court