Babloo v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In bail applications, the court granted release to petitioners Babloo and Sandeep on personal bonds. The court distinguished their role from the main accused, Shyam Lai, attributing the incident causing preterm delivery to Shyam Lai rather than the petitioners.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail by furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount.
What the court decided
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:07.10.2024 17:02:15 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
Marg. In the above noted FIR the complainantalleged that her husband was workingwith one Shyam Lai as Beldarbut Shyam Lai had not paid his dues. On 17'^ July, 2017 at about 5.30 p.m. her husbandwent to Shyam Lai to take his dues. After some time, she received the informationthat a quarrel has taken place between Shyam Lai and her husband. When she reachedthe spot, she found that ShyamLai, his sons Raj Kumar and Manpal and their relatives Babloo and Sandeep were beating her husband. When she tried to interveneto save her husband,the said personsgave beatingsto her also and Shyam Lai pushedher on a cart/rehdiknowingthat she was six months' pregnant. She was taken to the hospital in PGR van where she gave birth to two children,a boy and a girl, in the interveningnight of 19'^ and 20^'' July, 2017, who laterdied on 20^'' July, 2017 and 21'^ July, 2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a report from the Medical Board has also been obtainedand accordingto the Medical Board, the assault is not the reason for preterm delivery. The complainantwas suffering from Seizure disorder. Multiparty (Third Gravida) and Anemia which were the possiblereasons for pretermdelivery.She fiirtherstates that Manpal and Raj Kumar have already been grantedbail by the learnedTrial Court and thus, she claimsparity.
As noted above, the role assigned to Babloo and Sandeep, the two petitionersbefore this Court, is similar to that of Manpal and Raj Kumar. The allegationof pushing the complainantto the cart/rehdiresultingin the preterm delivery is attributed to Shyam Lai and not the two petitioners herein. Thus, consideringthe nature of allegations,this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioners. BAILAPPLN 473/2018&487/2018 Page 2of3
Page 2of3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners Babloo and Sandeep given the nature of allegations and the bail status of co-accused.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Babloo
- petitioner
Sandeep
- respondent
complainant
- respondent
Shyam Lai
- respondent
Manpal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court