Delhi HC disposed of a bail application in a criminal matter involving cheating and forgery. The court found no ground to grant bail due to multiple victims cheated on forged documents, rejecting the petitioner's argument about unbelievable transactions.
Bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Dushyant K.Mahant and Mr.Mohit Bhandari, Advocates for R- 2
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 14.05.2018
validate the ownership of the property in his favour on the basis of agreement to sell as executed between the petitioner and him. However, thereafter the petitioner did not come forward to execute the registry in favour of the complainant even after receiving the final balance payment of ₹5,00,000/-.
Sharma for a sum of ₹27,20,000/-.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 14, 2018 mamta
Page 3 of 3
BAIL APPLN. 198/2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted where ample transactions were entered into using forged documents to cheat multiple victims.
Whether the petitioner's contention that it is unbelievable for directors of one company to enter multiple agreements is legally sufficient for bail.
Whether the nature of allegations involving forged documents and multiple cheated parties precludes bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Javed Hussain
The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
