Hardev Singh v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dates 2018-01-18 dismissing an application seeking seizure of mobile phones. A second order dismisses a bail application that was withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~8
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 1907/2017
HARDEV SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rakesh C. Aggarwal, Ms. Manju Aggarwal, Advs. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with WSI Neetu PS K.N. Katzu Marg.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 18.01.2018 Crl.M.A. 1048/2018
By this application the petitioner states that the petitioner is being blackmailed and thus the mobile phones of the prosecutrix and her husband be seized.
In the present FIR the investigation is in case FIR No. 343/2017 and in case the petitioner has any grievance he would be at liberty to take remedies in accordance with law.
Application is dismissed.
BAIL APPLN. 1907/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
HARDEV SINGH
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court