An interim order permitting the filing of a vakalatnama for a bail application. The petitioner subsequently withdrew the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn by the single judge during an adjourned hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
SANJEEV ANEJA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Garima Anand and Mr. Sanjeev Aneja Advocates.
Versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Yogender, P.S. Crime Branch (SIU). Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, Advocates for Complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to file her vakalatnama by tomorrow. She has shown it to the Court and a copy of the same has been supplied to Mr. Chadha, the learned counsel for the State. Let it be so filed.
The learned counsel for the State submits that in the interim, another FIR has been registered against the petitioner on 11.09.2018.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
OCTOBER 15, 2018 sb
Sanjeev Aneja
State
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
