Order disposing of a bail application as infructuous. The court noted that petitioner no.2 is not an accused and petitioner no.1 has already furnished the accepted bail bond.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
KAILASO & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms.Swaty Singh Malik, Mr.Satinder Singh Mathur and Mr.Faizan, Advocates.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Rajender Singh from PS-G. Colony.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R
% 09.10.2018
Learend counsel for the petitioner submits that no specific demand of dowry has been alleged in the petiton.
Learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that petitioner no.2 is not an accused in this case. As regard petitioner no.1 is concerned, learned APP submits that she has already furnished the bail bond which has been accepted.
In view of this, this petiton is disposed of as infructuous and is dismissed.
A.K. PATHAK, J
ssc
OCTOBER 09, 2018
KAILASO & ANR
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
