Raman Roy v. the State ( NCT of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appeared unrepresented in a bail application. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed relief. The court dismissed the application due to the petitioner's absence.
Petitioner appeared unrepresented in a bail application. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed relief. The court dismissed the application due to the petitioner's absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
..... Petitioner
Through: None.
Versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R
% 23.07.2018
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes any relief to the petitioner.
None appears for the petitioner.
The case is dismissed in default.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
RW
JULY 23, 2018
RAMAN ROY
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court