Saurabh Khulbe v. Satte
Case brief
What is this about?
This court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest under IPC Sections 420/120B/34, directing release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions to cooperate with investigation.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and a surety in the same amount, subject to specific conditions.
What the court decided
$~15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 822/2018
| SAURABH K | HULBE | .... | . Petitioner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Through: Versus |
Mr. Manav Gupta and Garg, Advocates. |
Mr. Sahil | |
| SATTE | ..... R | espondent | |
| Through: | Mr. Tarang Shrivastava, | Additional | |
| Public Prosecutor for the | State with | ||
| SI Vinod Kumar, P.S. Subh | ash Place. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 20.07.2018
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail as he is apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 91/2018 under Sections 420/120B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Subhash Palace, Delhi.
It is the petitioner’s case that he was running a Call Centre with his friend from college times and they were being paid for their services by the clients; two such clients were M/s Jimmiwalls Enterprises and M/s D-Veer Enterprises, are mentioned in the FIR; the aforesaid two entities may have defrauded a number of persons but the petitioner is not a party to it. In terms of the previous order photographs have been brought on record by the petitioner to show that he was running an independent Call Centre at Delhi.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail in the present circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAURABH K HULBE
- respondent
MR. SAHIL SATTE
Coram
NAJMI WAZIRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court