Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in FIR 0681/2017. Court dismissed petition as infructuous because the underlying FIR had already been quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
FURKAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhlak Ali, Advocate.
Versus
STATE(THOURGH STANDING COUNCIL DELHI HIGH COURT) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Chhaju Lal, P.S. Gokulpuri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 18.07.2018
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.0681/2017 registered at Police Station Gokulpuri, Delhi under sections 452/323/324/506/380/34 IPC.
Since the FIR itself has been quashed in W.P.(Crl.) No. 432/2018, listed today at Serial No.13, this petition has become infructuous. The petition stands dismissed accordingly.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
JULY 18, 2018 sb
Furkan
State(Through Standing Council Delhi High Court)
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
