Ganesh Babu Gupta v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application regarding an FIR for cheating and forgery with an unpaid settlement, the High Court of Delhi denied bail citing non-compliance and absconding.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's bail application dismissed citing non-compliance with settlement terms and prior absconding.
What the court decided
$~19
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 1028/2018 GANESH BABU GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanue Shreshtha, Advocate.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with Insp. L.N. Saini, PS- Rani Bagh. Mr. A. Sharma, Advocate for complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R
% 17.07.2018
The petitioner seeks bail in FIR No. 237/2013 dated 22.07.2013 registered at Police Station, Rani Bagh under sections 420, 465, 467, 468 & 471 IPC. The petitioner is accused of having defrauded the respondent for an amount of Rs.1.28 crores. The parties had entered into a settlement on 07.10.2013, whereunder an amount of Rs. 58 lacs was to be deposited with the complainant. The payments have not been made. In view of the compromise, he was granted interim bail on 07.10.2013; thereafter he absconded, he did not appear before the Court, he was arrested on 01.10.2015, the interim bail order was recalled on 17.04.2014; and the charge-sheet has been filed.
In view of the above, no case is made out for grant of bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who failed to comply with payment obligations under a settlement and absconded.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GANESH BABU GUPTA
- respondent
STATE
Coram
NAJMI WAZIRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court