Superintendent filed application under Section 11 for appointment of sole arbitrator. Court appointed arbitration center to appoint arbitrator despite respondent's objection.
Parties referred to Delhi International Arbitration Centre to appoint sole arbitrator; arbitration proceedings governed by DIAC rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
RCI INDUSTRIES & TECHNOLOGIES LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Umesh Mishra, Adv.
versus
MANISH AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Aayush Bhatia, Mr.Pulkit Agarwal, Mr.Palav Agarwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
against the petitioner.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
DECEMBER 14, 2018 RN
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Chief Justice/Chief Arbitrator can appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 despite the respondent's refusal to consent.
Whether the respondent's intention to raise a counter-claim delays the appointment of an arbitrator.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RCI Industries & Technologies Ltd
Manish Aggarwal
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
