Allowed

M/S Omaxe Ltd. & Anr. v. Umesh Yadav

Delhi HC13 Dec 2018O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/115/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the petition for substitution of the arbitrator in an arbitration proceeding. The court terminated the mandate of the former arbitrator and appointed a new sole arbitrator, exempting the petitioner from further service efforts on the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Termination of Ms. Ravinder Kaur's mandate and appointment of Mr. Govind Chandrayan as Sole Arbitrator.

M/S Omaxe Ltd. & Anr. Vs Umesh Yadav — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 115/2018

¶4

M/S OMAXE LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Ms. Payal Agrawal, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

UMESH YADAV ..... Respondent Through: None.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 13.12.2018

¶12

This petition under section 14 read with section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to the as ‘Act’) has been filed by the petitioner seeking substitution of the Arbitrator.

¶13

The Arbitrator had been appointed by this Court vide order dated 08.03.2018 passed in Arbitration petition 40/2017. The said Arbitrator, however, vide order dated 16.07.2018 tendered her resignation and rescued herself from the Arbitration proceedings.

¶14

Attempts to serve the respondent in the present petition have not fructified.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even at the stage of the section 11 petition, the respondent could not be served personally and was finally served only through publication.

¶16

In any case, as the present petition is one only praying for substitution of the Arbitrator in place of the Arbitrator earlier

¶17

appointed by this Court, I do not think it necessary to make further efforts to serve the respondent with this petition.

¶18

In view of the above, while terminating the mandate of Ms. Ravinder Kaur as the Arbitrator, I appoint Mr. Govind Chandrayan , Former District & Sessions Judge, Bihar (G- 1422, Ground floor, C. R. Park, New Delhi- 110019, Mob. 9798047007, 9971149179) as the Sole Arbitrator.

¶19

The Arbitrator shall give disclosure in terms of section 12 of the Act before proceeding with the reference.

¶20

The Arbitrator shall also issue notice to the respondent before proceeding with the reference as in the earlier proceedings also the respondent was yet to be served.

¶21

The proceedings shall be conducted under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC). The DIAC Rules as to procedure and fees shall apply.

¶22

The petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to

¶23

cost.

¶24

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶25

DECEMBER 13, 2018 / sk

M/S Omaxe Ltd. & Anr. v. Umesh Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Omaxe Ltd. & Anr. v. Umesh Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vimala Dhingra Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Airbus Group India Private Limited Vs Anirudh Bansal & Anr.

National Highway Authority of India Vs Continental Engineering Corporation (Cec)

Shri Udbhav Goel Vs Shri Harshit Jain

Adi Construction Co. Vs Umang Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

Excel Pack Pvt. Ltd. Vs Hdfc Bank Ltd.