The court agreed to appoint an arbitrator post-dissolution of the firm for settling accounts under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Arbitrator appointed to settle accounts of the firm under DIAC rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Adarsh Kumar Tiwari, Adv.
versus
SH. AKHTAR HUSSAIN DHOBI
..... Respondent Through : Mr.Gagan Gandhi,Mr.Nishant Anand and Ms.Heena Mongia, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 08.01.2018
Both the counsels for the parties agree that an arbitrator be appointed and the application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the petitioner be treated as application for dissolution of the firm and the learned arbitrator may be directed to settle the accounts. As requested, the parties may appear before the learned co-ordinator, Delhi International Arbitration Centre on 16th January, 2018, who may appoint the arbitrator. The fee of the arbitrator shall be as per rules of DIAC.
The petition is disposed of.
YOGESH KHANNA, J
JANUARY 08, 2018 VLD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to appoint an arbitrator and settle the accounts of the firm.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VIJAYANT VIKRAM & ANR.
AKHTAR HUSSAIN DHOBI
YOGESH KHANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
