Allowed

Rajesh Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC15 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/9311/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five writ petitions challenging disqualification notices under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The High Court allowed the petitions after the Respondents verified pending NCLT disputes over management and the active status of the companies, directing removal of petitioners' names from the disqualified directors list.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to forthwith remove petitioners' names from the list of disqualified directors and post orders on the website within two weeks.

Rajesh Gupta Vs Union of India & Anr. — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~23, 43, 47, 48, 49, 66

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of Decision: 15^th March, 2018

¶4

W.P.(C) 1220/2018

¶5

SUNNY GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Manish Gupta, Adv versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, and Mr. R.K. Tiwari, ROC; Sh. Sanjay Shorey, Jt.Director

¶6

W.P.(C) 10809/2017

¶7

AKHIL KUMAR SUREKA AND ORS.

¶8

..... Petitioner Through Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Adv versus

¶9

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

¶10

..... Respondent Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Bhagvan Sarup Shukla, CGSC, and Mr. R.K. Tiwari, ROC; Sh. Sanjay Shorey, Jt.Director + W.P.(C) 9309/2017 SUMIT GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ashish Virmani and Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advs

¶11

WP(C) No. 1220/2018 & Connected matters

¶12

Page 1 of 5

¶13

versus

¶14

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, and Mr. R.K. Tiwari, ROC; Sh. Sanjay Shorey, Jt.Director

¶15

+ W.P.(C) 9310/2017

¶16

MADHU SUDAN CHOUDHARY

¶17

..... Petitioner

¶18

Through Mr. Abhishek Puri & Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR

..... Respondent

Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC and Mr. R.K. Tiwari, ROC; Sh. Sanjay Shorey, Jt.Director

+ W.P.(C) 9311/2017

RAJESH GUPTA

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Ashish Virmani and Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advs

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR

..... Respondent

WP(C) No. 1220/2018 & Connected matters

¶31

Page 2 of 5

¶32

Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, and Mr. R.K. Tiwari, ROC; Sh. Sanjay Shorey, Jt.Director + W.P.(C) 9027/2017 & CM Nos.36934/2017 AMIT GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ashish Virmani and Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advs versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, and Mr. R.K. Tiwari, ROC; Sh. Sanjay Shorey, Jt.Director

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶34

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

¶35

GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶36

These writ petitions have been filed by petitioners, who are directors in various company registered under the provisions of Indian Companies Act.

¶37

Apart from these Companies, the petitioners are stated to be Directors of other companies as well.

¶38

The writ petition has been instituted in view of the notice

¶39

WP(C) No. 1220/2018 & Connected matters

¶40

Page 3 of 5

¶41

dated 6^th September, 2017 and 12^th September, 2017 issued under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 by the respondents disqualifying the petitioners as Directors in the company for the reason that there was default in submitting returns with regard to the affairs of the said Company which were statutorily required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies for a continuous period of three financial years.

¶42

The writ petition inter alia seeks quashing of the said notices dated 6^th September, 2017 and 12^th September, 2017. 5. These writ petitioners contend that on account of disputes between the directors/shareholders, the companies had run into difficulty and statutory compliances in the nature of filing returns with the Registrar of Companies were not affected. Proceedings between the directors are stated to be pending before the National Company Law Tribunal. 6. At the time of issuance of notices in the writ petitions, we had granted interim orders of stay of the said notice dated 6^th September, 2017 and 12^th September, 2017 so far as they concerned the writ petitioners. 7. We are today informed by Ms. Maninder Acharya, learned ASG, on instructions from Mr.Kirtiman Singh, learned CGSC; Mr. Sanjay Shorey, Director (Legal) for the Union of India and Mr. Rakesh Tiwari, Registrar of Companies that the respondents have verified the above position and accept the stated position regarding the pendency of matters before the NCLT regarding the management disputes.

¶43

WP(C) No. 1220/2018 & Connected matters

¶44

Page 4 of 5

¶45

It is also an admitted position that all these companies are active companies even on date.

¶46

In view of this position, it is submitted by Ms. Maninder Acharya, on instructions, that the respondents shall remove these petitioners from the list of disqualified directors.

¶47

In view of the above, it is directed as follows:

¶48

(i) The respondents shall forthwith take steps for removal of the petitioners’ name from the list of disqualified directors.

¶49

(ii) The orders to this effect would be posted on the website and shall also be communicated to the petitioners within two weeks from today.

¶50

In view of the above, these writ petitions are allowed in the

¶51

above terms.

¶52

Dasti.

¶53

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶54

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶55

MARCH 15, 2018

¶56

WP(C) No. 1220/2018 & Connected matters

¶57

Page 5 of 5

Rajesh Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ataullah Khan Vs Satyawati College and Ors.

National Investor Forum Regd. Vs Golden Forests India Ltd.

Asha Devi and Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Canara Bank Vs the National Commission for Scheduled Castes & Anr.

Madan Gopal Sharma Vs Government of India and Anr.

Entertainment Television Network Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Pawan Kumar Vs Staff Selection Commission

Satyendra Kumar Vs Maharaja Agarsain Public School (Recognized) & Anr.

Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. Vs J C Bamford Excavators Ltd. & Anr.

Shreeji Overseas India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pec Ltd.

Unicorn Denmart Ltd. Vs Vatech Global Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Sunny Gupta Vs Union of India and Anr.

Asola Bhatti Residents Welfare Association (Regd.) Vs Govt. of (Nct of) Delhi & Ors.

Amit Gupta Vs Union of India