The court held that a petition filed by a residents' welfare association to assert private property rights cannot be treated as Public Interest Litigation and cannot be maintained in this court.
Withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to invoke appropriate legal remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ASOLA BHATTI RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD). ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kapil Dev Sapra, Mr. Vikas Dutta, Mr. Siddharth Silwal, Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Mr. J.N. Agarwal and Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advs.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASCGNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 15.03.2018
Page 1 of 2
petitioner to invoke such remedy as may be available in law.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 15, 2018
Page 2 of 2
Asola Bhatti Residents Welfare Association (Regd)
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
