Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition to allow fresh petition challenging a university order. Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
MS. AASTHA MEHTA NEE YADAV AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.S.K. Gupta, Adv.
versus
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ekta Sikri, Adv. with Mr.Jasbir Bidhuri, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 11.12.2018
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition in view of the fresh petition already filed in order to challenge the order dated 30.11.2018 passed by the university.
Permission granted with liberty as prayed.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
DECEMBER 11, 2018 ab
MS. AASTHA MEHTA NEE YADAV AND ORS.
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
