This court dismissed the review petition filed in W.P.(C) 152/2015 as no grounds for review were established. Consequently, related applications were rendered infructuous and disposed of.
Review petition dismissed; other applications disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
KANIJAN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Deepak Dhayani, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, Advocate for UOI. Mr Dhanesh Relan, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Rajeev Jha, Advocates for DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 06.03.2019 Review Petition 92/2019 (for review of order dated 10th December, 2018) & CMs. 10150-10152/2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
MARCH 06, 2019/ rd
Kaniyan & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
