Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No legal proposition is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
versus
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
After some hearing, the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2018 nn
DR. SUBHASH VIJAYRAN
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
