M/ S R & R Arts, v. Acit, Central Circle -7
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal filed against the impugned order dated 30.01.2018, holding that no substantial question of law arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
versus
ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -7 ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R
%
02.02.2018
A connected appeal, i.e., ITA 98/2018 also raised the similar issue which was rejected on 30.01.2018.
No substantial question of law arises.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed along with pending application.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2018 / vikas /
IT 109/2018
ACIT, Central Circle -7
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court