Held that the purpose of the writ petition regarding removal of encroachment of unauthorized construction is fulfilled by directions issued by the Supreme Court. Petition dismissed with liberty to file a complaint.
They are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a complaint before the appropriate Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Sondhi, Mr. Ashish Sharma and Mr. Deepak Kr. Sharma, Advs.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
unauthorized construction qua properties which are adverted to in the writ petition.
Devender v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. and connected cases
(batch of 16 cases) wherein we have taken note of the fact that Hon’ble
Supreme Court is seized of the issue pertaining to illegal constructions both ongoing and constructions already concluded and passed various orders including orders dated 24.04.2018 and 18.07.2018 passed in Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 4677/1985 M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.
filed before us in public interest stands fulfilled.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 14, 2018/ aky
PARIVARTAN FOUNDATION
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
